Project: [Project name]
Project manager: [Name]
PMO / register owner: [Name]
Review frequency: [e.g. weekly]
Escalation route: [Committee / responsible body]
Last updated: [Date]
This is the single working register. Each decision has one row; its status, decision-maker, deadline and short outcome are maintained here only. Most decisions need no additional page.
| ID | Decision required / question | Decision-maker | Required by | Status | Impact of delay | Decision / outcome | Reference / link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEC-001 | Approve the pilot at site A? | Steering committee | [Date] | Open | Pilot start may slip | – | – |
| DEC-002 | Use centralised or local testing? | Project manager | [Date] | Under review | Testing plan depends on it | – | [Optional detail page DEC-002] |
| DEC-003 | Approve additional testing resources? | Department head | [Date] | Decided | Testing schedule affected | Two testers approved | – |
Status definitions
How to use it: Add one row for each decision → name the decision-maker, date and impact → review the status regularly → record the outcome and link any resulting actions. For extensive supporting material, use the reference column.
Use only when needed. For larger, more complex or consequential decisions, create a child page under the Decision Log page. Copy the block below into that child page and replace the placeholders. Link the page from the relevant row in the register under “Reference / link.”
Important: The overview in section 2 remains the single source of truth for status, owner, due date and short outcome. A detail page adds background, options, evaluation and decision rationale. Do not maintain the same operational fields in two places. No automatic synchronisation is configured.
Decision ID: DEC-XXX
Decision question: [What exactly needs to be decided?]
Background / context: [Why is the decision needed?]
Options and assessment
| Option | Advantages | Disadvantages / risks | Effort / impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| A – [Label] | [Benefits] | [Drawbacks] | [Impact] |
| B – [Label] | [Benefits] | [Drawbacks] | [Impact] |
Project team's recommendation: [Recommended option and rationale]
Supporting information: [Links to documents, risks, Jira issues and approvals]
Decision rationale / supporting record: [Why was this option chosen? Where is the formal approval recorded?]
Consequences and follow-up actions: [Impacts, action items and links to their main tracking location]
Back to the master register: [Link to Decision Log overview]
Keep current status, decision-maker, due date and short outcome in the main register only. This detail page provides supporting context.
Both formats provide the same core register. The Excel version adds dropdowns, due-date calculations and summary metrics. Confluence provides a shared project page and optional linked detail pages. The two versions do not synchronise automatically.